Reviews & Opinion
Every review is scored against a published scoring rubric. Vendors and clinicians cannot pay to be reviewed, ranked higher, or removed.
Edited by Oliver Bennett
Latest reviews
3 published · 4 in the pipeline
Editor's Pick · Healthcare
8.6
Product · Canfield Scientific
A handheld stereophotogrammetry unit that remains the accuracy benchmark in cosmetic consultation imaging, five years after launch.
22 June 2026 · 8 min · €38,000–€52,000 first-year TCO
Recommended · Healthcare
7.8
Platform · Crisalix SA
A photogrammetry-based simulation platform that made 3D consultation viable for clinics that could not justify a stereophotogrammetry rig.
20 June 2026 · 7 min · €3,000–€9,000 per year, per clinic
Recommended · Healthcare
8.1
Product · Epic Systems / Microsoft
Native EHR integration is the deciding factor. For Epic hospitals, that alone changes the buying calculus.
14 June 2026 · 6 min · Bundled; typical enterprise addition €120–€260 per clinician / month
Opinion · The FC Rankings
All rankings →The FC 100
Future Chronicle's inaugural ranking of the hospital systems doing the most credible work to embed artificial intelligence into clinical and operational practice.
Published 1 June 2026 · 10 entries
The FC Rankings
Our first ranking of plastic-surgery practices across the Nordics and the UK setting the bar on clinical outcomes, transparency, and technology-enabled patient care. Editorially independent; no clinic paid to be included.
Published 25 June 2026 · 10 entries
The rubric
Every Future Chronicle review is scored on a 0-10 scale against a category-specific rubric. Weights are published with each review. Two analysts score independently; a third adjudicates when the delta exceeds 1.5 points.
Ratings map to four tiers: Editor's Pick (9.0+), Recommended (7.5-8.9), Consider (6.0-7.4), and Avoid (below 6.0).
Vendors and clinicians do not receive advance access to reviews. Advertising, sponsorship, and editorial are separated by a formal firewall. See editorial standards.