FC Health Index1,428.60+0.42%Novo NordiskDKK 812.4+1.10%Intuitive SurgicalUSD 546.9−0.30%EU AI Act — Art. 6in forceM+7FDA 510(k) AI clearances (YTD)312+18 w/wNHS AI Diagnostic Fund£123mcommittedKarolinska trials open48+2Reimbursement CPT codes (AI)17+1 QFC Health Index1,428.60+0.42%Novo NordiskDKK 812.4+1.10%Intuitive SurgicalUSD 546.9−0.30%EU AI Act — Art. 6in forceM+7FDA 510(k) AI clearances (YTD)312+18 w/wNHS AI Diagnostic Fund£123mcommittedKarolinska trials open48+2Reimbursement CPT codes (AI)17+1 Q
Wednesday, 26 August 2026 · Oslo · London · New York

Climate Tech · Analysis

Nordic direct air capture is scaling. The buyers are not.

Climeworks, Heirloom and a handful of newer entrants have delivered the first meaningful engineered removal capacity. Corporate offtake is not keeping pace.

K

By Kaisa Nieminen

Managing Editor · Helsinki, Finland

Edited by Ingrid Sørensen

Published 8 June 2026

6 min read

Evidence: Reporting

The story of the past three years in engineered carbon removal has been technical. Costs down, capacity up, first plants at meaningful scale on the Icelandic and Norwegian coasts. The story of the next three will be commercial.

The buyer base is narrower than the press releases suggest. Roughly a dozen corporates. Microsoft, Stripe, Shopify, Frontier's collective members and a small cohort of European industrials account for the substantial majority of high quality removal offtake announced through 2026.

This concentration is fragile. A change in accounting standards, in tax treatment or in the internal carbon neutrality commitments of any two or three of these buyers would visibly reprice the market.

The supply side is more diversified than the demand side, which is the inverse of a healthy commodity market. Until the buyer base broadens materially, either through regulated demand or through a substantial expansion of voluntary corporate commitment, the sector's scale up remains a policy story more than an engineering one.

Published 8 June 2026